Call for Papers: (Un)Common Worlds III – Navigating and Inhabiting Biodiverse Anthropocenes
RHN 49/2023 | Call
https://www.ruralhistory.eu/newsletter/2023/rhn-2023-049
https://www.ruralhistory.eu/logo.png
Organisers: Finnish Society for Human-Animal Studies, University of Oulu, University of Derby
4–6 October 2023, University of Oulu (FIN), University of Derby (UK), and online
Deadline for abstract submissions: 31 May 2023
Call for Papers:
(Un)Common Worlds III – Navigating and Inhabiting Biodiverse Anthropocenes
The theme of the third (Un)Common Worlds conference addresses ongoing environmental crises, including global biodiversity loss, from the perspective of human–animal studies, and in connection with ongoing discussions about framing this era as the Anthropocene.
The year 2022 marked the 30th anniversary of the Rio Convention on Biological Diversity, yet little positive change has happened, leading to the recent UN Biodiversity Conference (COP15) declaration that we are now dealing with an existential crisis. One of the identified root causes of biodiversity loss stems from people’s perceptions of other species – a realm of inquiry addressed widely in human–animal studies and critical animal studies.
From the 2010’s onward, scholarly interest in the relationships between humans and other animals has increased in human and social sciences. This work has been highlighting the role and status of animals in (human) societies under the new premises of pending ecological crises (Weil, 2010; Peters, Stucki & Boscardin 2014). Investigation of the social and cultural frames that inform human perceptions of other species, animals in particular, is gaining interest across disciplines, and established underlying onto-epistemologies (e.g. humanism or Cartesian dualism) are being reconsidered. Central to these advances is the call for opening spaces where framings productive of the unsustainable, unjust or harmful effects of these onto-epistemologies can be disrupted (Lupinacci 2019; Gunnarsson, et.al., 2016), and new more-than-human perspectives created (Sykes et.al., 2020).
The Anthropocene is one framing presented as both an explanation for and a potential solution to the ecological predicaments we are facing globally. This Age of Man, albeit a debated term, highlights permanent human impact on the Earth (Crutzen & Stormer, 2000), and centers on the responsibilities and possibilities for human solutions to the ensuing crises. Ways to overcome the complex challenges of the Anthropocene, such as biodiversity decline and climate change, are often sought through scientific and technological renewal (e.g. Thiele, 2020; Reynolds, 2021), but also through re-thinking of human relationships with the environment and the more-than-human world on different levels (e. g. Bird Rose and van Dooren, 2011; Craddock & Hinchliffe, 2015; Keith, 2016; Lorimer, 2015; Tammi, Hohti & Rautio, 2020; Stucki, 2023). At the same time, the very idea of the Anthropocene is critiqued for glossing over of the inequalities and injustices related to environmental crises (e.g., Yusoff 2018), as well as for sometimes amplifying environmental racism that is linked to colonial histories of exploitation of both people and nature are linked (e.g., Chao, Bolender & Kirksey, 2022; Nxumalo & Ross, 2019; Parikka 2014).
Central to human-animal studies scholarship in the Anthropocene is the questioning and dismantling of harmful dichotomies arising from the separation of nature and culture. In this regard, questions arise, for example, as to whether sustainable development can be achieved while relying on the anthropocentric ideas of mastery and stewardship (e.g., van Dooren, 2016; Cañada, Sariola, & Butcher, 2022), or alternatively and indeed, whether sustainability is a sensible framing and guiding principle (e.g. Bergmann, 2020; Rupprecht et. al., 2020; Policarpo et. al., 2018), paving the way for alternative approaches, such as interspecies / multispecies sustainability (Bergmann, 2019). The age of the Anthropocene presents an ontological challenge that reaches the core of scientific and scholarly premises and practices (Kraftl, et.al., 2020) and thus opens up spaces to develop creative, tentative, experimental research designs and propose new forms of collaboration, reporting and (re)presentation of human relations.
(Un)Common Worlds III encourages scholars across disciplines to submit individual or working group proposals that engage critically with ongoing environmental crises and existing framings – be they global ones such as climate change or the loss of biodiversity, coupled with framings such as the Anthropocene or sustainable development, or more local and situated conflicts arising from particular ways of perceiving animals and non-human life in our communities and societies. Working group proposals consist from 3 to 5 individual papers and a possible discussant that should fit in the time frame of a two-hour slot. Abstracts of papers are asked to be provided together with the proposal. The proposed presentations can be conventional scholarly or more arts-based interpretations of the conference theme and include a range of research designs from conceptual/theoretical to empirical and creative/experimental.
The proposals can include, but are not limited to, the following themes of navigating and inhabiting the biodiverse Anthropocenes:
- Animal ethics and the Anthropocene
- Post-colonial responses to the Anthropocene
- Historical framings of the relationships between humans and other animals
- Feminist understandings of environmental crisis
- Ways of productive interdisciplinary engagement to tackle the challenges of the Anthropocene
- The opportunities and challenges of alternative frameworks for addressing the current ecological crises (e.g. multispecies sustainability
- Representations of biodiversity loss/extinction in art (visual arts, literature, films)
- Affective responses to biodiversity loss and threatened non-human species
- Critical animal studies perspectives to the questions of biodiversity loss and the Anthropocene
- The futures of food, veganism and the animal industrial complex in navigating the Anthropocene
- The role of non-animal living beings, e.g. microbes, in inhabiting a biodiverse anthropocene
- Imagined futures in the post-Anthropocene
Timeline and instructions for submitting your abstract
- This CFP is open until 31 May 2023
- We will notify you if your abstract has been accepted in June 2023.
- Registration for the conference will open in June 2023.
Submit your abstract (max. 250 words) to uncommonworlds3@ykes.org (preferably as a word doc or a pdf file with the word “abstract” in the subject field of the e-mail). Remember to add a title for your presentation as well as your name and affiliation and contact information. Add to the abstract if the paper will be presented in-person or online. We also invite artists to present their work. Contact the organizers to discuss your ideas for this option.
More information and source: https://uncommonworlds3.wpcomstaging.com/ and https://networks.h-net.org